Fewer relapses in MS with off-label drug

The Phase 3 clinical trial is a multicentre study involving 195 patients from 17 hospitals in Sweden newly diagnosed with the most common form of MS, relapsing-remitting MS. Patients were randomly given either rituximab (Mabthera) or standard dimethyl fumarate (Tecfidera) treatment. During the 24-month follow-up, the occurrence of relapses, i.e., a temporary deterioration of the disease state, was investigated.

The results showed that those treated with rituximab had a five-fold lower risk of relapse. Only three out of 98 patients who received rituximab suffered relapses, compared to 16 out of 97 patients who received dimethyl fumarate. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) also showed that those who received rituximab had fewer new MS plaques, i.e., areas of damage or scarring in the central nervous system. No increased risk of adverse effects with rituximab was observed.

“The excellent efficacy and low cost of rituximab could make it an attractive first choice for newly diagnosed MS patients, not least in resource-poor areas. But more and larger studies are needed to confirm the drug’s efficacy, long-term safety and cost-effectiveness for MS,” says the study’s first author Anders Svenningsson, adjunct professor at the Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet and chief physician at the neurology clinic at Danderyd Hospital.

Rituximab is used for a variety of medical conditions but is not approved for the treatment of MS because there has been a lack of data from phase 3 clinical trials. However, the drug has been shown to have a good effect on relapsing-remitting MS and is therefore often prescribed off label, which means that the treating doctor alone assumes responsibility for the treatment.

“Since the patent has expired, there is no incentive from the pharmaceutical company holding the marketing rights to apply for a new indication. But now, in addition to accumulated clinical experience, we also have the documentation that is usually required to apply for an indication. Our study is an important step on the way for rituximab to become an approved MS drug,” says Anders Svenningsson.

The study was funded by the Swedish Research Council. Several of the authors have listed potential conflicts of interest, see the scientific article for a full list. Anders Svenningsson has served on the data safety monitoring board of GeNeuro. Co-author and KI researcher Fredrik Piehl has received research grants from the pharmaceutical companies Janssen, Merck KGaA and UCB, as well as fees for serving on data monitoring committees in clinical trials with Chugai, Lundbeck and Roche.

Publication: “Safety and efficacy of rituximab versus dimethyl fumarate in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis or clinically isolated syndrome in Sweden: a rater-blinded, phase 3, randomised controlled trial”. Anders Svenningsson, Thomas Frisell, Joachim Burman, Jonatan Salzer, Katharina Fink, Susanna Hallberg, Joakim Hambraeus, Markus Axelsson, Faiez Al Nimer, Peter Sundström, Martin Gunnarsson, Rune Johansson, Johan Mellergård, Igal Rosenstein, Ahmad Ayad, Irina Sjöblom, Anette Risedal, Pierre de Flon, Eric Gilland, Jonas Lindeberg, Fadi Shawket, Fredrik Piehl, Jan Lycke. The Lancet Neurology, online 13 July 2022, doi: 10.1016/PIIS1474-4422(22)00209-5.